MoDOT recently completed a set of projects on Lindbergh Blvd and New Halls Ferry to upgrade the pedestrian facilities. These projects included improving and adding sidewalks and curb ramps, pedestrian crossings, and upgraded access to bus stops. [These projects] also allow for better access for persons with disabilities.

The work MoDOT has performed is mostly commendable. Following a widely reported fiasco on an earlier sidewalk project along Lindbergh Blvd that took 3 attempts and 4 years to get mostly right, the curb ramps and sidewalks MoDOT installed are of very good quality. What is baffling, however, is that MoDOT seems to have purposely omitted one crosswalk at every single signalized intersection within the limits of its various projects. Proof of the purposeful omission lies in the concrete corner islands as seen in the photo at the top.

Left: A pedestrian crosses Lindbergh Blvd at Charbonier Rd where no marked crosswalk exists.
Right: MoDOT failed to install a crosswalk on the south side of Schuetz Rd at Lindbergh Blvd.

Some people argue that since “nobody” actually walks on or across Lindbergh Blvd, there’s no need for pedestrian accommodations. People who make such arguments have likely only ever experienced a road’s conditions from a windshield perspective.

For example, I spent 3 minutes at the intersection of Lindbergh Blvd & Charbonier Rd to get a photo for this post. In that time, I saw two pedestrians attempt to cross Lindbergh on the south side of the intersection where the crosswalk had been omitted. As seen in the photo above on the left, one woman darted across despite the missing crosswalk; the other woman was pushing a baby stroller and almost did the same until she noticed the lack of a curb cut in the corner island on the far side of the intersection. The young mom then proceeded to cross the other three sides of the intersection to more safely get across Lindbergh Blvd and to her destination.

A rare curb ramp—to nowhere—in Huntliegh.

At regular three and four-way signalized intersections, crosswalk installation should be a rather simple affair: one crosswalk per side unless there are mitigating circumstances. As I recounted above, every crosswalk serves a purpose even when unmarked. To omit a crosswalk at one intersection could be understood as a simple mistake or engineering necessity. To omit a crosswalk at every intersection… perhaps it is spite from MoDOT’s battle with Paraquad? Whatever the reason, its logic does not make sense.

Finally, I shall refrain from discussing the “sidewalks” in Huntleigh where MoDOT cried uncle and replaced the majority of the bad curb ramps it had installed with full height curbs: a regression to their original state from 2006.

Posted by Herbie Markwort

I like to write about transportation.


  1. Well, Huntleigh (home to Paul McKee) is a different place, but at the others there's no omission, the crosswalks were designed that way to funnel pedestrians into a single crossing. It's cheaper and supposedly produces fewer ped/car conflicts, expcept of course when pedestrians just go off and do whatever they want. Damn pedestrians!

  2. I believe that should read, "except of course when pedestrians go off and do what is their right: attempt to get to the other side of the street safely." Oh, as for the story, if MODOT had cried uncle, they wouldn't have fought tooth and nail just to do the minimum, then give up and take the dick route and reinstall an illegal and noncomplying ramp. Inbred Rolla douchebags, is what they are.

  3. Maybe signal timings conflict with an actuated pedestrian crossing being added to the omitted legs. However, I think lengthening the signal cycle is a perfectably acceptable tradeoff to improving pedestrian safety.

Comments are closed.